Deciding the Undecidable: Wrestling with Hilbert’s Problems
نویسنده
چکیده
In the year 1900, the German mathematician David Hilbert gave a dramatic address in Paris, at the meeting of the 2nd International Congress of Mathematicians—an address which was to have lasting fame and importance. Hilbert was at that point a rapidly rising star, if not superstar, in mathematics, and before long he was to be ranked with Henri Poincaré as one of the two greatest and most influential mathematicians of the era. Like Poincaré, Hilbert worked in an exceptional variety of areas. He had already made fundamental contributions to algebra, number theory, geometry and analysis. After 1900 he would expand his researches further in analysis, then move on to mathematical physics and finally turn to mathematical logic. In his work, Hilbert demonstrated an unusual combination of direct intuition and concern for absolute rigor. With exceptional technical power at his command, he would tackle outstanding problems, usually with great originality of approach. The title of Hilbert’s lecture in Paris was simply, “Mathematical Problems”. In it he emphasized the importance of taking on challenging problems for maintaining the progress and vitality of mathematics. And with this, he expressed a remarkable conviction in the solvability of all mathematical problems, which he even called an axiom. To quote from his lecture:
منابع مشابه
Automorphisms Mapping a Point into a Subvariety
The problem of deciding, given a complex variety X , a point x ∈ X , and a subvariety Z ⊆ X , whether there is an automorphism of X mapping x into Z is proved undecidable. Along the way, we prove the undecidability of a version of Hilbert’s tenth problem for systems of polynomials over Z defining an affine Q-variety whose projective closure is smooth.
متن کاملHilbert’s Tenth Problem for Algebraic Function Fields of Characteristic 2
Let K be an algebraic function field of characteristic 2 with constant field CK . Let C be the algebraic closure of a finite field in K. Assume that C has an extension of degree 2. Assume that there are elements u, x of K with u transcendental over CK and x algebraic over C(u) and such that K = CK(u, x). Then Hilbert’s Tenth Problem over K is undecidable. Together with Shlapentokh’s result for ...
متن کاملHILBERT’S TENTH PROBLEM FOR FUNCTION FIELDS OF VARIETIES OVER NUMBER FIELDS AND p-ADIC FIELDS
Let k be a subfield of a p-adic field of odd residue characteristic, and let L be the function field of a variety of dimension n ≥ 1 over k. Then Hilbert’s Tenth Problem for L is undecidable. In particular, Hilbert’s Tenth Problem for function fields of varieties over number fields of dimension ≥ 1 is undecidable.
متن کاملHilbert’s Tenth Problem for Function Fields of Varieties over Algebraically Closed Fields of Positive Characteristic
Let K be the function field of a variety of dimension ≥ 2 over an algebraically closed field of odd characteristic. Then Hilbert’s Tenth Problem for K is undecidable. This generalizes the result by Kim and Roush from 1992 that Hilbert’s Tenth Problem for the purely transcendental function field Fp(t1, t2) is undecidable.
متن کاملAs Easy as Q: Hilbert’s Tenth Problem for Subrings of the Rationals and Number Fields
Hilbert’s Tenth Problem over the rationals is one of the biggest open problems in the area of undecidability in number theory. In this paper we construct new, computably presentable subrings R ⊆ Q having the property that Hilbert’s Tenth Problem for R, denoted HTP(R), is Turing equivalent to HTP(Q). We are able to put several additional constraints on the rings R that we construct. Given any co...
متن کامل